Trio entitled to opinion, but not the facts on judicial, well-settled law
After listening to Jim Wheeler, Len Semas, and Don Gustavson talk on a poorly produced radio show called " Conversations from the Capital" they broached the subject and implied that arbitrary and capricious state nullification of federal laws was not only allowed but also a new
requirement and litmus test for candidacy to hold political office as a Republican. This is an insult to the Constitution and the rule of law.
They never cite case law to support their positions, but they present themselves as constitutional scholars and experts on the Bill of Rights. They are neither!
When I hear these cheap demigods talk about "judicial activism " it only means they hate a ruling by the courts that they disagree with. But, when there is a ruling that they agree with, then they espouse their definition of "judicial restraint".
They are entitled to their ignorant opinions...but not entitled to the facts and a misinterpretation of constitutional and well-settled law.
The false doctrine of "nullification" was one the reasons that resulted in the Civil War !
Do you really want to assert this argument to be re-considered again in the 21st century?
I consider myself to be a conservative...but these type of individuals is the primary reason I left the Nevada Republican Party. The inmates have taken over the asylum. I despise every one of them.! And yet, as they scratch their empty heads they still can't figure figure out why they remain in the minority.
Here is a link to a site I really like. Go here.